Here is the summary for Topic 5 (of 5) from the Health Care and Social Media chat on August 16th, 2009 on Twitter.
53 people joined the chat with 636 tweets about #HCSM (134 were Re-tweets)
@tstitt moderated this night’s chat and provided this pre-briefing.
Anything retweeted 2x or more gets a bold and italics treatment- Minimal editing done for clarity. The info for the whole chat is split into three posts by topic
Here are all the topics for the night. The other three topics are highlighted in the linked posts.
Here are the best tweets (IMHO) for TOPIC 5 – From a pharma perspective, which social media Tools, Messages and Services are important now, next year & why?
cyberslate @stephaniethum @ahier: T5: reduce medication errors ‘Pillbox; http://bit.ly/I4WZd
healthblawg see summary of rountdable on the legal/regulatory piece of this I facilitated last month http://bit.ly/jJz1M
tstitt When you think “pharma and social media”, what company or product, if any, comes to mind first?
DaphneLeigh @tstitt Novo Nordisk
philbaumann A good follow in Pharma is @pfizer_news – personable, interactive, good content sharing.
ahier Txt messages, etc. to remind take meds – renew Rx via social media
nanarcr @ahier Not sure txt messages to take meds, etc., w/work without requiring a response
stephaniethum @nanarcr @ahier Cincinnati Children’s just did a study on texting medication adherence reminders.
stephaniethum @ctsinclair @ahier @cyberslate @nanarcr Article re: texting medication adherence at Cincinnati Children’s http://bit.ly/pMvJn
qeanmedical Retweets of a pharma tweet with an added off-label use comment, ugh.
ctsinclair RT @qeanmedical: T5 Retweets of a pharma tweet with an added off-label use comment, ugh. “Pharama exec nightmare or dream?”
philbaumann @ctsinclair Good point, but patients with little voice aren’t usually egged on by cunning lobbyists who know media manipulation.
hillarts @philbaumann I think SM is one of the best ways to clear away media manipulation
philbaumann @hillarts Totally agree! Given our times, it’s one of its most important features. Not w/o its problems, but helpful nonetheless
ctsinclair @philbaumann But those may not be quick to correct the mis-information that leads to increased med use for off-label
gravityten pharma has a negative persona. They(collectively) can & should use socmed to bring them back to a positive brand perception
mkmackey More communication with clinical trials and seeking patients is important for pharma
tstitt E.g., the @racewithinsulin graphics & initial rules of engagement could have been better. But the campaign opened doors & minds.
blausengroup The more medical education a chronic disease patient can get the better they will be able to participate in managing their care
MeredithGould My sense is that pharma always plays the regulatory card to justify lag in social media adoption.
RickenFlow pharma companies will soon move from tv commericals to social media but probably wont engage folks
arthurwlane medication adherence and generic switching programs
nanarcr @JOSullivan @danielg280 Chronic condition monitoring long distance by email w/specialist works great 4 me. Good model to follow
MeredithGould @mageier Right. I’m thinking that we might not see what we think we should see relative to social class variables.
philbaumann Pharma’s got big challenges. Poor blokes. A lot seem to have started mainlining Twitter tho. That’s good, right?
healthblawg FDA has been mostly silent on its view of SM which keeps most pharma from doing anything
AccessCR Until lawyers start tweeting and engageing, they probably won’t let their clients, eg pharma….
danielg280 Yes, lawyers are starting to see the value of SoMe. many states have restrictions about attorney advertising which complicates it tho
arthurwlane also depends on how we look at pharma – as a PBMs or as drug manufactures
—————–
Join #hcsm on Tweetchat.com Sunday nights.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3bbcd034-85bd-4b31-bf62-b357db52395d)
Comments on this entry are closed.